What Is Common Criteria in Cybersecurity? Benefits & Uses

Common criteria (CC) is a standardized framework for evaluating the security features and capabilities of information technology systems. Think of it as a report card for IT products, assessing how well they can protect against threats. This system isn't just about ticking boxes; it's about ensuring that products meet a globally recognized set of security requirements.

History of the Common Criteria framework

The first version of the common criteria framework was published back in 1999. Before it, various countries had their own standards, which made it tricky for companies working in international markets. 

There was the TCSEC (Trusted Computer System Evaluation Criteria) in the United States, ITSEC (Information Technology Security Evaluation Criteria) in Europe, and CTCPEC (Canadian Trusted Computer Product Evaluation Criteria) in Canada. The need for a unified system became clear. Wouldn't it be easier if everyone spoke the same security language?

CC was a collaborative effort by various countries, including the US, Canada, and members of the European Union, who came together to streamline their processes. Companies trying to sell cybersecurity products that needed approval in multiple regions could now do so without jumping through many hoops. 

With CC, your product only needs to be evaluated once, and this evaluation is accepted across all participating countries. It’s like having a universal passport for your IT products.

Real-world examples help in grasping how CC is applied. Picture a company developing a firewall. When they submit their firewall for CC evaluation, testers will analyze it against set criteria. They'll look at aspects like its ability to control data flow and protect against unauthorized access. If it passes, they'll issue a CC certificate. This certificate tells customers, “Hey, this product meets international security standards.”

Common Criteria isn't static. It's evolved over the years. The framework gets regular updates to tackle new security challenges and incorporate feedback from the industry. This adaptability ensures it remains relevant amidst the ever-changing landscape of cybersecurity threats.

So, whenever you hear about a product being 'CC certified,' know that it has undergone rigorous testing. It’s not just a badge of honor. It’s a sign of trustworthiness and assurance in its ability to safeguard information.

Benefits of implementing Common Criteria in company networks

Ensures your IT products and systems meet international security standards. 

This is not just a technical upgrade but a strategic move to enhance trust and reliability. Think of it this way: when you introduce a new device or software into your network, you need assurance that it's secure. CC certification acts as that assurance. It’s like having a security seal of approval that customers and partners recognize globally. 

Picture a bank deploying a new firewall system. By choosing a CC-certified solution, they know it's gone through rigorous testing. This doesn’t just secure their operations but also builds confidence with customers who entrust their money to them.

Reduces the complexity when dealing with international markets

If you are expanding your operations or dealing with partners overseas, having CC-certified products can smooth out many obstacles. It's like having a security passport that’s accepted worldwide. 

Take, for instance, a cybersecurity company offering services in multiple continents. With CC-certified products, they minimize the need for redundant evaluations in each country, speeding up market access.

Encourages collaboration

When diverse organizations use products with a common security standard, it fosters greater compatibility and interoperability. Imagine different departments in a multinational company relying on varied technologies but all adhering to the same security benchmarks. This can streamline operations and enhance communication. 

We’re not just talking about faster email responses or better video calls. We’re talking about a robust, interconnected system where security isn't an afterthought, but a built-in feature.

Drives innovation

When security is a standardized expectation, developers are free to focus on creating new features and improving usability. For example, a tech startup can innovate their application features without having to reinvent the security wheel for every update. They know the security framework is in place, allowing them to dedicate resources to what their users want most.

Promotes transparency

When products and systems are CC-certified, they know what standards are being met. It’s not just about knowing their data is safe; it’s about understanding how that safety is assured. This transparency fosters trust and can be a significant differentiator in today's market.

Incorporating Common Criteria into company networks is more than a technical decision. It's a strategic approach to security, trust, and global business readiness.

Key components of Common Criteria

Security Functional Requirements (SFRs)

Imagine SFRs as the blueprint detailing every security feature a product must have. They're not just a checklist; they're a necessity. Picture a smartphone trying to secure its users' data. The SFRs would cover aspects like encryption to protect sensitive information and access control to ensure that only authorized users can get in. 

Consider audit logging, too. If someone tries to access your device without permission, audit logs can track these attempts, providing an essential breadcrumb trail for security experts to follow.

Security Assurance Requirements (SARs)

These are all about the quality and reliability of the security functions outlined in the SFRs. It's not just about having encryption, but rather ensuring that encryption is implemented effectively. 

Imagine a new software application designed for online banking. An SAR would evaluate the process by which developers built this encryption. It ensures they follow best security practices throughout the software's lifecycle, from design to deployment.

Another example where SARs come into play is in the development of a smart home security system. This system must be reliable and consistently protect against breaches. Evaluators will scrutinize the processes followed to build it, ensuring the system can withstand potential attacks. They will be looking at the security measures used during development and maintenance, ensuring every angle is covered.

Consider network devices like routers or firewalls, which are part of your daily digital lives. They need to meet global security expectations. The SFRs here would demand robust data encryption and secure communication channels. SARs, in turn, would assess these devices' ability to consistently provide secure connectivity, verifying that the development process effectively minimizes vulnerabilities.

The beauty of these components is their adaptability. They cater to diverse products, like an integrated circuit in a credit card, or a complex network system for corporate use. Each product type has specific SFRs and SARs tailored to its unique security needs. This structured and thorough approach is what makes Common Criteria so instrumental in today’s cybersecurity landscape.

How to integrate Common Criteria into existing networks

Step 1. Assess what you currently have

This is all about understanding the existing network setup. For example, let’s say you already have a series of firewalls in place. You must determine whether they’re CC-certified or if you need to upgrade. This initial assessment helps you figure out what components meet the criteria and which ones don’t.

Step 2. Identify your Target of Evaluation (TOE)

This means pinpointing which parts of your network need to meet the Common Criteria standards. Think of a retail company’s network, where the payment processing system holds sensitive customer data. 

Your TOE might include the transaction servers and the databases they connect to. Once identified, you can focus your efforts on ensuring these components meet CC standards.

Step 3. Choose the right Evaluation Assurance Level (EAL)

This is crucial. It guides you on how deep the evaluation for your network components should go. For instance, a basic network setup might only need EAL1 or EAL2, which covers functional and structural testing. 

However, a more sensitive component, like the payment system we discussed earlier, might require a higher EAL for added security assurance. This choice keeps us on track with your security goals.

Step 4. Prepare the Security Target (ST)

The ST outlines the specific security needs of your TOE, providing a clear roadmap for what must be secured. It’s like laying out the blueprint before construction begins. 

This document might be developed in-house or with the help of a CC consultant. Picture a healthcare provider outlining the security requirements for electronic health records; the ST would include details on encryption and user access controls.

Involving a Testing Laboratory early in the process is wise. It ensures your preparation aligns with what the evaluators will need. Imagine them as partners in this journey, helping refine your systems to meet CC standards. Regular communication with the lab is essential; it ensures you adjust quickly to any feedback or issues they identify.

Finally, once your systems are ready, you proceed with the evaluation itself. Here, the evaluators review everything against the CC framework. If issues arise, you address them promptly to keep things moving forward. Think of it like a quality assurance check before a product launch. You want everything running smoothly to achieve that CC certification.

Throughout this process, it’s important to remember that every step is about building trust in your systems. By integrating Common Criteria into your networks, you are not just meeting international standards – you are enhancing security and reliability for everyone relying on your tech.

Tools and resources available for implementation

When implementing Common Criteria in cybersecurity, having the right tools and resources is crucial. It's like having a well-stocked toolbox before starting a project. Let's break it down.

For application vulnerability scanning, you will often rely on tools like WebSleuth. It's a free, open-source tool that's perfect for auditing the security of web applications and code. 

Imagine WebSleuth as a detective combing through your web setup, looking for vulnerabilities like parameter manipulation or information leakage. It’s thorough and presents its findings in a readable format, which is a huge time-saver. 

If you're working with web servers, commercial scanners like N-Stealth and Qualysguard are game-changers. They automate the scanning process, matching your server's data against a vast database of known vulnerabilities, ensuring you spot any weaknesses before they become problems.

Another essential tool is an application 'shield' like Sanctum's AppShield. It acts as a guard, inspecting the traffic between a web server and browser. With its dynamic policy recognition engine, it detects and blocks suspicious activity without relying solely on predefined signatures. Think of it as a bouncer at a club, recognizing who belongs and who doesn’t. 

Ubizen's DMZ/Shield also provides valuable protection. It works at the application layer, filtering all incoming requests and allowing only those that are truly needed. It's like having a security filter that only lets the right data through.

Configuration and file integrity are areas where tools like Tripwire shine. You can use Tripwire for Web Pages to ensure web content hasn’t been silently altered. It calculates a hash value for each page, alerting me if something changes. 

Tripwire is similar to having an invisible seal of authenticity on each piece of content. If you're managing servers, Tripwire for Servers can do the same, keeping your configurations in check by alerting you to unauthorized changes.

During development, quality assurance is key. Cenzic's Hailstorm is an excellent tool for this. It uses fault injection to expose vulnerabilities, simulating attacks to see how your application holds up. 

The tool is like a mock drill in an emergency response plan, ensuring everyone knows their role when things go wrong. These kinds of proactive measures allow you to identify and fix vulnerabilities during development rather than after deployment.

Each of these tools supports the implementation of Common Criteria by addressing specific security functional and assurance requirements. They're not just about achieving compliance but also reinforcing your network's security posture, ensuring you’re prepared for any threat. By integrating these tools, you find peace of mind knowing my systems are both robust and resilient.

Challenges and considerations in implementation of Common Criteria

The complexity involved in aligning existing systems with CC standards. 

Picture an organization using legacy systems that aren't CC-certified. Upgrading or replacing these systems to meet CC requirements can be daunting. It's not just about swapping out hardware or software; it's often about modifying entire workflows to accommodate new technologies. 

For instance, consider a bank with an old transaction system. Switching to a CC-certified system means ensuring compatibility with existing processes, which can be both time-consuming and costly.

The resource-intensive nature of the CC evaluation process

Achieving CC certification requires a significant investment of time and effort. The need for detailed documentation can be overwhelming, especially for a company new to the process. 

Imagine a mid-sized tech firm aiming for CC certification for its latest product. They might need to hire extra staff or experts to handle the paperwork and testing aspects. It’s like preparing for a massive audit where every aspect of your product is scrutinized. This can stretch resources thin, particularly if the company isn't well-prepared for the demands of a CC evaluation.

Cost

The expenses related to hiring consultants, conducting tests, and possibly upgrading systems can add up quickly. Even larger corporations with more resources may find the process financially challenging. 

Take a multinational corporation deploying CC-certified solutions across different countries. While they might have the budget, the coordination and consistency required for certification in multiple regions can inflate costs significantly. This can be a deterrent for smaller entities considering CC certification.

Certification timelines

The CC evaluation process isn't quick. Depending on the complexity, it can take anywhere from months to years. Let's say an organization is looking to get a product to market swiftly. If CC certification is part of the plan, they’ll need to account for potential delays. 

That can impact strategic goals, like launching a new service or product in a competitive market where time-to-market is crucial. The need for certification can push back release dates, affecting overall business strategies.

Keeping up with the evolving standards of Common Criteria

This presents its own set of difficulties. The framework is regularly updated to address new security threats, which means companies must stay informed and agile. 

Consider a software firm whose product was certified two years ago. If there have been updates to the CC standards since then, they might need to re-evaluate their product to maintain compliance. This requires a continuous commitment to monitoring and adapting to new requirements, which is a resource-intensive process in itself.

Navigating these challenges requires careful planning and strategic foresight. It's about balancing the need for compliance with the practicalities of implementation, ensuring that the pursuit of CC certification enhances—rather than hinders—the business.

Evaluating and certifying network security

Incorporating Common Criteria in network security adds a robust layer of credibility. It's like having an international badge of honor for your security solutions. 

When you evaluate and certify network security, you follow a structured process set by Common Criteria (CC). It's intense but necessary. Every step I take ensures your tech is up to global standards.

Imagine you're evaluating a network firewall. This is critical as firewalls are the gatekeepers of any network. The CC process requires verifying whether it effectively controls data flow and restricts unauthorized access. It's tricky. 

You must dive deep, testing not just the obvious but the intricate details like encryption and data integrity checks. These firewalls are like digital sentinels, and they must perform flawlessly under pressure.

Also consider intrusion detection systems (IDS). They're your first responders in cyberspace. Put these systems through the wringer, checking how they identify and respond to threats. It’s similar to running fire drills. Simulate attacks and watch how the system reacts:

• Is it fast enough? 
• Does it alert the right people? 

These are just a few questions you must ask during evaluation. Your job is to ensure that, even in the heat of the moment, the IDS doesn't falter.

Let's not overlook routers and switches. They may seem mundane, but they're crucial. These devices must communicate securely to maintain network integrity. The CC framework demands rigorous testing on these fronts. 

Test for things like secure configurations and encrypted communications. It’s like checking all the locks on your house—ensuring there’s no easy way for intruders to slip in unnoticed.

In addition to hardware, software applications can't be ignored. Consider a banking app. The stakes are high here. Your job is to ensure that such apps apply encryption correctly and protect user data from prying eyes. Evaluate how the software handles data, both in motion and at rest. It's like double-checking that a vault door is as strong as promised.

This methodical approach not only safeguards our networks but also provides peace of mind. When a product earns CC certification, it's been through a rigorous vetting process. 

Customers and partners can trust that it's ready to face current cybersecurity threats. This is how you must approach evaluating and certifying network security infrastructures, ensuring they not only meet but exceed expectations.

What is the evaluation process for Common Criteria certification?

Evaluation process for Common Criteria certification is a well-defined path to proving that an IT product meets rigorous security standards. It’s methodical, and each step demands precision. Let’s break it down. 

Step 1. Identify the product's Target of Evaluation (TOE)

This involves specifying exactly which parts of the product or system are under evaluation. Imagine working with a secure messaging application. The TOE might include the encryption protocols and the user authentication mechanisms used by the app. It’s all about narrowing down to what's essential for security. 

Step 2. Develop the Security Target (ST)

The ST outlines the precise security functionalities the product needs to demonstrate, serving as a blueprint for evaluation. If you are working with a financial application, the ST would detail requirements like data encryption and user access controls. Creating a comprehensive ST ensures there are no ambiguities when it comes to evaluating security features.

Step 3. Choose the right Evaluation Assurance Level (EAL)

This is a strategic move. The EAL determines the depth and rigor of the evaluation process. For example, a basic network device might only require EAL1 or EAL2, which covers some functional and structural testing. 

However, if you are dealing with a more sensitive product like a government database system, a higher EAL, such as EAL4 or EAL5, might be necessary to ensure an extensive evaluation of its security mechanisms. 

Once the EAL is set, the product undergoes thorough testing. This is where it gets intense. Evaluators put the product through its paces, checking it against the Security Functional Requirements (SFRs) outlined in the ST. 

If the product is a firewall, you would expect it to demonstrate robust access control and effective data filtering capabilities. The evaluators will simulate threats to ensure it can handle real-world challenges. 

Throughout this process, documentation plays a key role. Everything needs to be documented meticulously. This includes design specifications, test plans, and results. Imagine evaluating a software application for secure communications; it requires detailed records of encryption methodologies and test scenarios. This documentation not only supports the evaluation but also serves as a reference for future audits or re-certifications.

Interaction with a certified Testing Laboratory is vital, too. These labs are your partners in this journey. They provide feedback, identify any gaps, and guide necessary adjustments. 

Regular communication ensures the evaluation stays on track, and any issues are promptly addressed. For a network security product, this might involve multiple rounds of testing and refining until every requirement is met.

As the process concludes, the evaluators compile a comprehensive report. This document details their findings, highlighting both strengths and weaknesses. 

For a product to earn a CC certification, it must meet all the specified criteria without significant issues. This report becomes a testament to the product’s compliance with international security standards.

Levels of assurance in Common Criteria certification

Assurance levels in Common Criteria certification measure how confident you are in a product's security. It's not a one-size-fits-all concept; think of it as a sliding scale that determines the depth of the evaluation a product undergoes. 

Each level, known as an Evaluation Assurance Level (EAL), specifies the rigor and extent of testing required. This helps ensure that the product meets its security requirements reliably.

EAL1

This is where it all begins. It offers a reasonable assurance that a product has been functionally tested. Imagine a simple network switch that's relatively low-risk. It might just need EAL1, where testing confirms it performs its basic functions correctly without delving too deeply into its underlying architecture or processes.

EAL2

This level adds a bit more rigor. It involves structural testing. Think about a small business firewall. At EAL2, you not only test its basic functions but also examine its design documentation to verify that there's a consistent implementation of security features. It's like doing a double-check to ensure the parts are working together as expected.

EAL3

This level includes methodical testing and checks. For example, suppose you are evaluating a communications device for a mid-sized enterprise. At this level, evaluators go deeper, assessing not just functionality and design but also examining the product's development environment to ensure it follows secure development practices.

EAL4

This is often seen as a sweet spot for commercial off-the-shelf products, combining methodical design, testing, and review. Imagine a software solution for a healthcare provider handling sensitive patient data. EAL4 would require detailed testing and design review, alongside a thorough process evaluation. This ensures the product is robust enough to protect critical information from sophisticated threats.

EAL5

Here, you embrace semi formal design and testing. Consider a high-stakes system like a government encryption module. EAL5 involves rigorous testing, including formalized processes and documentation, to verify it's ready to handle highly sensitive tasks. This level demands an in-depth examination of design and development, focusing on real-world resilience.

EAL6 and EAL7

It’s important to note that each level builds on the previous one. Higher assurance levels, like EAL6 and EAL7, are often reserved for the most critical systems, where even the smallest flaw could have severe consequences. 

Think of military-grade encryption devices or critical infrastructure components. These require extensive formal verification, analyzing every detail to ensure maximum reliability and security.

Through these assurance levels, you gain varying degrees of confidence in the product’s ability to resist threats. This framework helps tailor the evaluation process to suit the specific needs and risk profiles of different products, ensuring they meet the necessary security requirements.

How Common Criteria certification benefits the company and its stakeholders

Unlocks new levels of trust and credibility with stakeholders

This trust isn't just a nice-to-have; it's a game-changer. For instance, when you think about the benefits to the company itself, the immediate boost in market reputation stands out. Customers and partners realize they're dealing with a company that prioritizes security, making your products or services more appealing. 

Imagine a financial institution looking for security software. They're likely to choose a CC-certified product because it assures them of a rigorous evaluation process, diminishing their risk of data breaches.

Brings clarity and focus

For your development team, CC certification brings clarity and focus. It provides a structured framework that aligns with best practices in security design and implementation. 

By following these guidelines, developers can concentrate on innovation without reinventing the wheel for security measures. If you are developing a new mobile banking app, the security framework is already laid out, allowing the team to channel efforts into enhancing user experience and adding new features. This is not just efficient; it drives innovation by freeing up resources that would otherwise be spent on patchwork security fixes.

Saves costs

Even though the certification process demands an initial investment, it often mitigates the risk of costly security breaches. Consider a healthcare provider adopting a CC-certified electronic health record system. The likelihood of a security incident is significantly reduced, saving potential financial losses from breach-related fines and reputational damage. 

For insurance purposes, too, CC certification can be a bargaining chip, possibly lowering premiums due to the enhanced security stance.

Stakeholders beyond the company, such as clients and partners, gain peace of mind knowing they're dealing with a business that adheres to internationally recognized security standards. This is especially critical when handling sensitive data. 

Picture a multinational corporation needing a secure cloud service to store its proprietary information. A CC-certified solution assures them that their data is safeguarded by robust security measures, thus fostering a stronger partnership based on trust.

Enhances your competitive edge

This particularly applies to your international markets. If you are looking to extend your services across borders, having a globally recognized certification smooths the path. It acts like a passport, bypassing multiple country-specific security evaluations. 

Take, for example, a tech company entering the European market. With CC certification, the acceptance process becomes quicker and less cumbersome, allowing quicker entry and capturing market share before competitors can catch up.

In essence, CC certification aligns with the strategic goals of the company, promoting growth and stability. It reassures stakeholders by demonstrating a commitment to high security standards, thereby nurturing trust and fostering loyalty.

How Netmaker Enhances Network Security and Management

Netmaker can significantly enhance network security and management, aligning well with the principles of Common Criteria (CC) certification. By utilizing Netmaker's virtual overlay networks, organizations can create secure, encrypted tunnels between machines, ensuring data integrity and confidentiality, which are key components of CC's Security Functional Requirements (SFRs). 

Netmaker's Egress and Remote Access Gateways allow external clients to securely access internal resources, facilitating compliance with international security standards by ensuring robust access controls and secure data flow. These features are crucial for preventing unauthorized access and protecting sensitive information, as emphasized in the CC framework.

Moreover, Netmaker's capability to create a flat network that securely connects machines across multiple locations supports the strategic deployment of CC-certified solutions across international markets. This not only simplifies network management but also enhances interoperability and scalability, crucial for expanding operations globally. 

Netmaker Professional offers advanced features like OAuth integration and user management, allowing organizations to streamline authentication processes and manage user permissions effectively. By adopting Netmaker, organizations can strengthen their security posture, reduce complexity in meeting global security standards, and foster trust among clients and partners. 

Sign up here to get started with Netmaker and explore all its features and capabilities.