When choosing a software-defined networking solution, performance, security, and scalability are crucial factors. This comparison examines Netmaker and ZeroTier, two leading solutions in the space. Netmaker, powered by WireGuard® technology, delivers industry-leading performance with average speeds of 1223 Mbps - nearly twice the speed of alternative solutions. With its modern dashboard, comprehensive API coverage, and enterprise-grade security features, Netmaker provides a robust platform for organizations seeking high-performance virtual networking with uncompromised security.
1. Technology
|
Netmaker |
ZeroTier |
Core Technology |
Built on WireGuard®, delivering native kernel-level performance with minimal CPU overhead |
Custom protocol with Salsa20/Poly1305, user-space implementation with higher overhead |
Network Architecture |
Full mesh P2P with direct connection between nodes |
Hybrid mesh with centralized roots, requires root server coordination |
Performance |
1223 Mbps average speed |
626 Mbps average speed |
Connection Type |
Direct P2P with fallback relay |
P2P with root server coordination |
Key Difference: Netmaker's use of WireGuard® provides significant performance advantages, while ZeroTier's custom protocol prioritizes compatibility but may impact speed.
2. Setup and Management
|
Netmaker |
ZeroTier |
Management Interface |
Modern dashboard with advanced features, built-in metrics and monitoring |
Simple, user-friendly interface |
Configuration Options |
Extensive networking controls |
Basic network settings |
API Access |
Full API coverage |
Limited API functionality |
Automation Support |
NMCTL for command-line automation, extensive API |
Basic automation options |
Key Difference: Netmaker offers more granular control and automation options, while ZeroTier focuses on simplicity and ease of use.
3. Self-Hosting
|
Netmaker |
ZeroTier |
Self-Hosting Option |
Full support, open source |
Limited self-hosting capabilities |
Deployment Flexibility |
Docker, K8s, bare metal |
Primarily designed for cloud service |
Documentation |
Comprehensive self-hosting guides |
Limited self-hosting documentation |
Key Difference: Netmaker provides more robust self-hosting capabilities with better documentation and deployment options.
4. Scalability
|
Netmaker |
ZeroTier |
Node Limit |
No technical limit |
Practical limits based on root servers |
Performance at Scale |
Maintains performance |
May degrade with large networks |
Multi-Network Support |
Unlimited networks |
Limited by subscription tier |
Key Difference: Netmaker's architecture allows for better scaling without performance degradation.
5. Pricing
|
Netmaker |
ZeroTier |
Free Tier |
• Self-hosted - unlimited nodes
• Unlimited networks
• Network metrics
• Network relay
• Community support
|
• 1 admin
• 25 nodes
• Unlimited networks
• Community support
|
Professional |
• $99/month base
• 20 users
• 100 devices
• 5 networks
• Network metrics
• Network relay
• Email + chat support
|
• $5/month base
• Additional nodes $2/node/month
• Includes SSO
• Community support
|
Business |
• $249/month
• 100 users
• 300 devices
• 15 networks
• White labeling
• Custom domain
• Priority support
|
• Contact sales
• Custom pricing
• White labeling
• Custom domain
• Priority support
|
Enterprise |
• $599/month
• 500 users
• 1000 devices
• 100 networks
• Contact sales for custom plans
• Dedicated support
• Custom features
|
• Contact sales
• Custom pricing
• Dedicated support
• Custom features
|
Key Differences:
- Netmaker uses a tiered pricing model with fixed user/device counts
- ZeroTier uses a per-node pricing model after the base subscription
- Netmaker offers more included features in lower tiers
- ZeroTier's pricing scales with more granularity, but has a higher per-unit cost
- Both offer enterprise custom pricing for large deployments
This pricing structure makes Netmaker more cost-effective for larger deployments, while ZeroTier is more economical for smaller deployments that need just a few nodes above the free tier.
6. Security
|
Netmaker |
ZeroTier |
Encryption |
WireGuard (ChaCha20) |
Custom (Salsa20/Poly1305) |
Authentication |
OIDC, OAuth2, 2FA |
Basic authentication |
Access Controls |
Granular ACLs, RBAC |
Network-level controls |
Network Isolation |
Advanced segmentation |
Basic network separation |
Key Difference: Netmaker provides more enterprise-grade security features and authentication options.
7. Platform Support
|
Netmaker |
ZeroTier |
Linux |
Full support |
Full support |
Windows |
Full support |
Full support |
macOS |
Full support |
Full support |
Mobile |
Remote access client |
Native apps |
IoT/Embedded |
ESP32 support |
Limited support |
Routers |
OpenWRT, MikroTik, etc |
Limited router support |
Key Difference: Both offer broad platform support, but Netmaker has better IoT and embedded device integration.
When to Choose Each Solution
Choose ZeroTier if you need:
Choose Netmaker if you need:
- Simple, fast remote access for small/medium businesses
- Cost-effective team connectivity that scales with you
- Superior performance with WireGuard® technology
- ACL for managing access across all devices
- Easy deployment and management through modern dashboard
- Flexible options for authentication and access control
- Reliable security for distributed teams
- Excellent support and documentation
- Straightforward pricing model for growing businesses
Next Steps